Pay To Access Harper

A lot has been said recently about people paying to have access to the Prime Minister.

https://twitter.com/nbf54321/status/618830788998639616

Ling has said:

So @KoryCPC asked me to write a story about how I can't ask Harper questions without paying $78,000. I obliged. http://t.co/8V3HCr7o7m

— Justin Ling (Has Left) (@Justin_Ling) August 24, 2015

Perhaps it’s too obliging to ask the Harpercons about their exploitation of ISIS propaganda in this campaign?

While it's just a media access issue, I think @Justin_Ling is registering a valid concern here. http://t.co/VYtGygISTt

— Don Martin (@DonMartinCTV) August 24, 2015

Atwood has said (to the apparent chagrin of the Nat Po):

The censored sections are significant, and accuse Stephen Harper of hiding “the two-million-dollar-donors to his party leadership race,” and make reference to Harper having given “four mutually exclusive answers” about the Duffy cover-up.

Angry Old Guy has said:

.@ceebdweeb @EnoughHarper No. I suspect he's their exact target demographic. #elxn42 #cdnpoli pic.twitter.com/7MFxa6c7VB

— Stephen Lautens (@stephenlautens) August 18, 2015

—

Maybe Novak and Perrin and the clowns in the PMO didn’t have the required money to access the PM with the timely news of Senator Duffy’s Wright-payoff in time to prevent him from misleading the House of Commons?