A lot has been said recently about people paying to have access to the Prime Minister.
Ling has said:
Perhaps it’s too obliging to ask the Harpercons about their exploitation of ISIS propaganda in this campaign?
Atwood has said (to the apparent chagrin of the Nat Po):
The censored sections are significant, and accuse Stephen Harper of hiding “the two-million-dollar-donors to his party leadership race,” and make reference to Harper having given “four mutually exclusive answers” about the Duffy cover-up.
Angry Old Guy has said:
Maybe Novak and Perrin and the clowns in the PMO didn’t have the required money to access the PM with the timely news of Senator Duffy’s Wright-payoff in time to prevent him from misleading the House of Commons?