A Great Day For Canada

About fricken time the Liberals and NDP came to an agreement to stop the never-ending short election cycle. This should have happened last year. Now let’s get some movement on electoral reform, the #ClimateCrisis, and reconciliation, among many other files the parties can agree on. The Greens are also likely to support many bills.

https://twitter.com/saskboy/status/1506303885543157762

#TommyDouglas was a #socialist and because of him #PierrePoilievre parents were not billed for his delivery. #Medicare #DentalCare

— DESIGNmike 🇨🇦 (@designmike1) March 22, 2022

Moe has already responded with petulant ignorance and mischaracterization of what’s happening.

https://twitter.com/saskboy/status/1506302168437035010

And it’s not that Conservatives don’t understand, many do. It’s that they just don’t care, and have calculated they’ll get more mileage from misinforming voters.

If Pierre Poilievre and Candice Bergen are having a tantrum, something good for Canadians probably just happened

— Tom Parkin (@TomPark1n) March 22, 2022

This is how a minority govt is supposed to work. It benefits everyone. Most of this country are centrists, with left leaning social beliefs. With the far-right ravaging the CPC, this is a good move https://t.co/N794zJRpZc

— Tracey Kent (@TraceyKent) March 22, 2022

I don't know about anybody else, but with a major war unfolding in Europe, I'm glad to have stable government for the next few years.

— Peggy Blair (@peggy_blair) March 22, 2022

"The Prime Minister should work with the people occupying downtown Ottawa!"

– CPC, February 2022

"How dare the Prime Minister work with the NDP!!"

– CPC, March 2022

— Barney Panofsky's Best Intentions (@mynamesnotgordy) March 22, 2022

CPC in October 2021: How dare Trudeau call an expensive, unnecessary election!
CPC in March 2022: How dare Trudeau form an agreement with the NDP to ensure we don't have another expensive, unnecessary election!

— Aaron Hoyland (@aaronhoyland) March 22, 2022

How on earth can a majority of members of parliament decide the direction of the country, within the constraints of the constitution? Who would design a system like that?

— Paul Fairie (@paulisci) March 22, 2022

https://twitter.com/saskboy/status/1506139234981269508

My eyes would like a word with the Liberals and NDP who don’t think they should include sight as an aspect of covered public health.