Made In Canada Scam

The Harper Conservative party promised a Made in Canada plan to address climate change, in response to backing out of Kyoto. That plan never came, which was no surprise to people paying attention to their true agenda of high pollution at the expense of our health and climate.

A spokesman for Environment Minister Leona Aglukkaq declined to answer questions about the memo directly. “Our government is committed to protecting the environment while keeping the Canadian economy strong,” spokesman Ted Laking said in a statement.

You may recall Lying Leona from the howler of a lie she told about Canada’s coal plants.


4 responses to “Made In Canada Scam

  1. The problem has been one of problem definition. Allowing others to debate anthropomorphic global warming and/or climate change others the naysayers to pretend that there’s still a debate by ignoring the established facts. When I was young, we simply used the general term POLLUTION. Who the hell wants to stand up and publicly defend ongoing pollution? Let’s get back to calling it what it is, pollution, and see if Harper and his acolytes will stand up and defend ongoing and increasing pollution.

  2. Pingback: Made In Canada Conservative Hypocrisy | Saskboy's Abandoned Stuff

  3. theglobeandmail. com//news/politics/harper-misleading-canadians-on-greenhouse-gas-emissions-analysts-says/article26716824/?cmpid=rss1&click=sf_globe

    “Conservative Leader Stephen Harper is grossly misleading Canadians by claiming his government has succeeded in reducing greenhouse gas emissions, one of Canada’s leading environmental analysts said Thursday.

    In leaders’ debates, Mr. Harper has boasted that Canada’s emissions are now lower than they were in 2005 before he took office, saying his government was the first to see a reduction in greenhouse gases (GHGs).

    Conservative Leader Stephen Harper says Alberta’s recession was worsened by Rachel Notley’s NDP government raising taxes at a time when oil prices are low. Harper also took aim at Liberal Leader Justin Trudeau’s plan to run deficits.

    Tom Mulcair promised action to counter climate change under an NDP government Sunday. At a Toronto campaign event, the party leader slammed Stephen Harper who he said has “fired” or “muzzled” scientists as prime minister.

    But in a report released Thursday, Simon Fraser University professor Mark Jaccard concludes that it was not federal action that reduced GHGs, but instead the recession of 2008-09, British Columbia’s carbon tax, and Ontario’s effort to phase out coal-fired power.

    “In the nine years since its promise to reduce Canadian emissions by 20 per cent by 2020 and 65 per cent by 2050, the Canadian government has implemented virtually no policies that would materially reduce emissions,” Mr. Jaccard said. “The 2020 target is now unachievable without great harm to the Canadian economy.”

    At the Copenhagen climate summit in 2009, Mr. Harper revisited his original 2020 promise, and matched the U.S. commitment to cut carbon emissions by 17 per cent below 2005 levels by 2020 – a goal that Mr. Jaccard said is now essentially out of reach.

    Liberals and New Democrats are promising a more assertive federal role as countries prepare to negotiate an international climate treaty at a United Nations summit scheduled for Paris in early December.

    The NDP is particularly ambitious, vowing to impose a national emissions cap and trading scheme that will help reduce emissions by 34 per cent below 1990 levels by 2025. Justin Trudeau pledges that a Liberal government will work with the provinces to adopt national carbon pricing and set new targets for emission reductions.

    Mr. Jaccard has a long history of issuing “report cards” on federal climate policy, and frequently attacked the former Chretien government for failing to regulate carbon emissions. In the report Thursday, he gave the Harper government a “failing grade.”

    GHG emissions have fallen between 2007 and 2013 “but that has nothing to do with any policies he has implemented, and that has been a gross misrepresentation,” the professor said in an interview. “There were no [federal] policies to cause that – zero.”

    The Harper government did pass regulations to phase out traditional coal-fired power, but those won’t have an impact for the next 10 to 15 years. As well, Ottawa has matched U.S. moves to imposed increasingly tough fuel efficiency standards on vehicles, but, again, those regulations will yield little result before 2020.

    Mr. Jaccard said that, if the Conservative government had begun the implement policies when it first promised, the cost to the country to meet its international commitments would have been significantly less than it will now be.

    To hit Mr. Harper’s 2020 target would require a carbon price of $50 a tonne this year and rising to $150 in five years – or regulations of equivalent effect. Quebec’s cap-and-trade program – which Ontario intends to join – had a carbon price this year of roughly $15 a tonne; B.C.’s carbon tax is $30 a tonne.

    -Shawn McCarthy”

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s