ConCalls: Who Did The Domestic Calls? #RoboCon #elxnfraud

Some behind the scenes numbers about Elections Canada’s impotent investigation into illegal robocalls…

[note Prime Contact, which came up in the blogosphere earlier this week.]

81. At the national level, the Conservative Party, using data from its Constituent Information Management System (CIMS) database, called through two primary telemarketing companies: Responsive Marketing Group (RMG) for live calls, and RackNine for automated calls. Individual candidate campaigns used a variety of telemarketers. For its part, the Liberal Party used its Liberalist database and called electors through two telemarketing companies, Prime Contact and First Contact, while individual candidate campaigns used several telemarketers …

83. They were unable to establish the content of that call or determine that the call received was the one about which the elector submitted a complaint. As a result, in many cases, it was simply not possible to gather any information confirming the allegation made by a given complainant that he or she had received an inappropriate call.

So, because there was no recording of the crime, investigators and Elections Canada overlooked the testimony of witnesses from whom they were able to obtain evidence of phone calls made to those multiple people with the same complaint?!

85. A number of the telemarketers providing the bulk of call services for the Conservative Party or Conservative Party candidates were contacted by investigators. Most agreed to co-operate. Investigators were told that no telemarketer had independent access to the Conservative Party’s CIMS database, and that each relied on selected CIMS elector data provided to them by the party or by local campaigns for calling purposes. Two telemarketers, RackNine and RMG, retained recordings of their calls. Only one telemarketer, RMG, advised electors of their poll locations.
Campaign Research

86. Campaign Research provided call services to 39 local Conservative Party campaigns and called 89 complainant numbers during the election. The company does not retain recordings of calls made. Campaign Research provided investigators with a list of call display numbers used. One matched a call display number reported by a complainant, but as no call recording was available, investigators were unable to determine the call content. Investigators were advised that Campaign Research callers worked from a script, a sample of which was provided. The text of the script raised no concerns relevant to the investigation. Investigators were told that callers did not have access to, or provide electors with, poll location information.
Front Porch Strategies

87. Front Porch Strategies is an American telemarketer with a Canadian operation. Investigators learned that Front Porch Strategies provided services to 10 Conservative Party campaigns for telephone town hall meetings, and did not provide poll location information to electors. The company provided their call display numbers, none of which could be linked to the impugned calls.
RackNine

88. RackNine sent recorded messages on behalf of the Conservative Party and a number of its local campaigns during the 41st general election. In all, 405 complainant numbers were matched to RackNine-generated calls under the supervision of an independent expert third party. The role of the expert third party with RackNine, and with other telemarketers, was established by investigators to ensure that database matching and data extraction, where necessary, were done in a way that ensured the integrity of the process and the resulting data collection, and protected privacy interests. The RackNine calls to complainants were linked to 92 separate recorded messages. Upon listening to each of these messages, investigators discovered that 87 messages related to the 41st general election, while the remainder related to other political events or entities. The messages were solicitations of support or announcements of upcoming events; none were problematic and none provided poll location information. Footnote 16

Responsive Marketing Group
Responsive Marketing Group Calls and Communication of Poll Locations

89. RMG provided live calling services to the Conservative Party national campaign and 80 local campaigns, using CIMS calling data provided by the party or by local candidates. RMG was the only telemarketing service in the 2011 general election that made and retained recordings of live calls.

Instead of prosecuting the crimes they could confirm …

118. Investigators have not been able to confirm many instances of nuisance calls. Some have been confirmed to a certain extent, but none of these situations provided investigators with evidence of intent to commit an offence under the Act.

they dismissed them because their investigation made incorrect assumptions about the actus reus of the crime!

Had a false or untraceable incoming number been used in an effort to purposely misdirect electors, investigators again would have expected to see a pattern with multiple calls into a single electoral district from the same number, as occurred in Guelph. No such pattern was found.

Elsewhere in the document Elections Canada admits that VOIP robocall systems could easily use different or faked source numbers.

Why would they assume the fraud conducted throughout Canada would be just like Guelph, when Guelph clearly differed in execution from most of the other reported illegal calls?

9 responses to “ConCalls: Who Did The Domestic Calls? #RoboCon #elxnfraud

  1. Thank you for your ongoing series of posts on this issue, it is clear that misleading and fraudulent calls were made to electors across Canada and that non supporters of the CPC were targeted. That the Harper Regime made every effort to block ECs investigation and that the Unfair Election Act does NOT propose to give them more investigative powers says it all.

  2. John….I think it’s finally time you stop grinding on this thing….before they come to get you with a net and a little white jacket…..you are just confirming that this has turned into an obsession and I’m sure there are people beginning to see that and are quite worried about your behavior !!

  3. Really Ron? When I see your bizarre behavior? You have an obsession with a dictator, that should be thrown off this planet. You likely even think, Harper is a Conservative. I saw through Harper and his Alliance in 2002. I even know, just who donated to that Alliance Party too. Then there is Harper’s Northern Foundation.

    I firmly believe Harper cheated the last election, using his robo-call fraud. I firmly believe, Harper has all of his ducks in a row, to cheat the next election too.

    The only true words Harper has ever uttered is? I am the law. I make the rules. And, by the time I get through with this country, you won’t recognize it. That is for sure. Canada has never had an evil fascist dictator, running this country before.

    Harper is the one and only Canadian PM ever, to be held in contempt of Parliament.

    So Ron? Keep your head, right where you have it.

  4. I’m just sayin’ that John has spent hours and hours typing thousands of words about “Robocalls” and did it change anything…..NO !!

    Gross waste of valuable time.

    All he has done is preach to a choir of idiots like Thwap/Adanac and other assorted ideological lefties who stop by to encourage him.

    I will leave you with this….

    “God grant me the serenity to accept the things I can’t change….courage to change to things I can and the wisdom to know the difference”.

    What’s been missing here…… is the wisdom !!

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s