SGI Bike Uprising

Doesn’t SGI know it’s not cool to cause an uprising amongst those most likely to ride motorcycles up and down the streets of SGI brass?

The increase in motorcycle insurance rates cannot be to just break even, since the value of the insurance is past the value of the object it is insuring in some cases! A car’s insurance starts out being 1/25th of the total vehicle at times in its life. Toward the end of the vehicles’ mechanical life, it’s still less than 1/2 (annually) in most cases.

SGI should be fair, and any case where the insurance is more than 50% of the bike, knock it down to that if it’s not lower than the rate being charged already. Even then, after two years, they could afford to buy the motorcyclist a new bike of the same age/quality, and still make money! Could you envision paying $4000/year to insure your $8000 car? It’s absurd.

Some rates will go up and others will go down, but the most dramatic change will be sport bikes and bikes with engines over 400 cubic centimetres.

Saskatoon’s Colby Guldie just bought a new motorcycle and found out his rate could go from $180 a month to $368 month. He says that’s not fair.

“You know, if I’m at fault for an incident I think, yeah, I should be paying more, that makes sense to me,” he said. “But I’m five years running now with a clean motorcycle record. I don’t think I should be having my rates doubled, bam, just like that.”

Guldie says it’s unfair that SGI is lumping smaller bikes with much faster ones. He’s already written to politicians and to SGI and says he’ll attend public hearings to fight the proposed increase.

While almost all motorcycle users will pay double-digit increases, some will pay even more.

To look at an extreme case, someone with an old sport bike (1982 and older) with a 1200-cc engine who used to pay $1,001 a year might have to pay $4,309 in future — a 331 per cent increase.

Explaining the proposed hikes, SGI president Andrew Cartmell said motorcycle users have relatively high injury claim costs. The proposed increase is “significant”, but with the rates as they currently are, motorcycle users are essentially being subsidized by all the other drivers, he said.

(emphasis mine)

They need to use the SGI points system to fix this problem. If someone has a perfect driving record, they should get a discount to close to the amount they’ve been paying now. Even so, it feels like a “bait and switch” scam to those who’ve bought bikes thinking they had affordable insurance rates. In Saskatchewan, every motor vehicle must be insured to be driven, yet there is only one insurance provider: SGI. Traditionally they have the best rates in the country, but this motorcycle-boondoggle is an example of why they need competition here.


3 responses to “SGI Bike Uprising

  1. Motorcycle riding is a privilege, not a right. I for one applaud the Saskatchewan government’s initiative of ridding the roads of these menaces. It’s about time that these 2 wheeled 1%ers paid their fair share. What’s next? subsidizing BMW covertables? Why should we, the 99% have to pay for the real risks of the seasonally rich driving? Irrespective of accident history, whether or not you have a clean record, everyone should pay their fair share. Just because some are lucky shouldn’t mean deathcycle riders with multiple accidents should be peanalized. That’s discrimination.

    This isn’t social engineering like artificially raising prices on cigarettes, alcohol, gasoline or SUV’s, this is about improving the public good, pure and simple. Unlike guns, pesticides or business permits, there is NO increase in bureaucratic red tape. Something the government can introduce later! :) !

    Every right-thinking leftoid MUST agree that government intervention in the free market capitalist market place brings nothing but endless bounty’s of goodness and happiness! Gone are the worries of having to make business sense, outlawing competition does away with that, or having to worry about profits! Just providing for the good of the people. Now if we could only put every corner of the economy and decision making authority into government control it should be pure social and financial nirvana…

    Or would it? Hmmmmmmmm…..

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )


Connecting to %s