ConCalls – Globe & Mail Should Blush

IMG_9174There are days I worry that the Globe and Mail is unfit for birds to poop on it. If their endorsement of the Harper Conservatives prior to last year’s electoral fraud riddled election wasn’t enough of a credibility hit, there’s their more recently published Ibbitson column claiming Harpercons wouldn’t openly lie. I don’t think Ibbitson’s latest reversal makes up for that, because it’s not only the Conservatives’ reputation that has been shot to pieces by fighter jets.

Dave reminded me of how disappointed I am in the Globe and Mail. He thought of the same Ibbitson column, but put it in relation to the F-35 lies that are flying faster and more furious than any vapourware JSF jet. (hyperlinks added are my additions):

Remember when Ibbitson wrote this about Harper and others in relation to electoral fraud in the last federal election?

As a general rule, politicians never openly lie, because the consequences of being caught in one just aren’t worth it. (Think Watergate, Monica Lewinsky.) Neither of these men would take that risk.

We have absolutely no further reason to accept that premise in any way. Harper is a liar; his minister of national defence is a liar; his associate minister of national defence is a liar; and his minister of public works is a liar.

Hands up if you think Harper didn’t know about the voter suppression effort in May 2011. Because he says he didn’t?

Right. Thought so.

The only people worse than liars in power, are those who defend them (while entrusted with the media’s role to defend Canadians). Well, the liars are maybe worse. Can we agree they are both worthy of our scorn?

Let’s enforce the damned law. Since there’s no mandatory minimum sentence for Electoral Act violations (so far as I know), I can only hope a judge assumes that “Tough on Crime”(TM) Conservatives would demand the maximum sentences allowed for electoral fraud. Is a Quarter Billion Dollar fine big enough though? Oh, and don’t forget the five years in prison. Since our judges seem to like concurrent sentences, I suppose five years is the most we can hope for when punishing the people guilty of destroying Canada’s good reputation, and our trust in democracy.

4 responses to “ConCalls – Globe & Mail Should Blush

  1. They are all parts of the corporatocracy- corporations/government/media. Those who are not the active participants self censor if they know what is good for them career wise. Corporate charters have to be changed to force them to be responsible citizens of a sustainable society.

  2. The only use for the glob and Mail is to use as a lining for my bird cage and, put by the door while I train my puppy. No other option makes any sense like they are famous for.

  3. Thank You AGAIN SASKBOY, for your always MOST thorough and rigorous treatment of the SUBJECT MATERIAL … PLEASE BEAR WITH ME, AS I MUST SEE / HEAR THIS ONE MORE TIME :


  4. After we get harper in for five years for electoral fraud, we can haul his ugly ass back into court for war crimes charges..

    This political bowel movement must be destroyed.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in: Logo

You are commenting using your account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s