Raging entirely by voice recognition

I wrote a article the other day for my blood using voice rec mission on my android phone and it is very impressive how so much is it was very accurate although it did make a few mistakes.
Today I may not be speaking clearly enough because it is making any more mistakes including a mistake in the title same raging instead of writing.
I was surprised friend since I was able to understand regina saskatchewan I was sure it might start replacing the word regina with something having to do with a female anatomy.

Mm after I said the word vagina if for some reason inserted the word cock and balls as well.

So beware if you write your blog posts entirely through voice recognition you’re bound to end up with some interesting mistakes.

Copyright Radical

I’m a copyright radical, like most younger people. I wasn’t born that way, but Napster, and the war on Napster and filesharing helped shape my vision of what people need to do to remain free.

As most TED talks are, this is an amazing video on how to understand culture and arguments against copyright/SOPA. Youth consume and create content online, and childhood is now criminalized and forced underground, which radicalizes people both for and against the law. I’ll freely admit I take a radical view of copyright now to work around it when possible, and help balance the situation by leading others away from the boxes they are put into by companies like MPAA and Viacom. This doesn’t mean I take whole DVDs and make perfect copies to try and sell for a profit, it means I will use photos or video available online, put a funny caption inside it, and share that new article. And I download TV, and have for more than a decade before most people knew it was technically possible. Now most people take it for granted that they can PVRecord shows, or find them on The Pirate Bay.

Lt. Pike and Santas adapted from Tumbleweed:-)

Hey look, it’s a Creative Commons photo, coupled with a newsworthy image of Lt. Pike! With amusing caption and credit to those who provided the original works.

Dances With Oil

If Stephen Harper were a character in a Hollywood epic movie about the western Canadian frontier, and went to live with the First Nations people, I can’t help but think his alternate name would be Dances With Oil. He sure doesn’t dance with the one he brings to the ball. He wants to give the appearance of listening, but he won’t because he sees First Nations as his “adversaries”.

DFAIT hilariously has labeled First Nations as “adversaries” in their struggle to promote Tar Sand oil, and ship our brains out to the USA and China. The PMO calls environmentalists “enemies of the state”.

Occupy Regina January
-A sample of Harper’s “enemies of the state”

Canada’s Department of Foreign Affairs and International Trade has labelled aboriginal groups and environmentalists as “adversaries,” while describing the National Energy Board, an independent federal regulator of industry, as an “ally” in its public relations strategy to polish the image of Alberta’s oilsands, a newly released internal document has revealed.

The document outlines key goals for the government’s diplomats in promoting the industry, which is considered to be the fastest-growing source of global-warming-causing emissions in the country, and in lobbying against foreign climate change policies.

Rich U.S. groups that funded environmentalists also gave to Canadian government

Tax returns show the Canadian government has also been the beneficiary of millions of dollars in largesse from some of the wealthiest private organizations in the United States.

And some of that money came from the same U.S. groups that helped fund Canadian environmentalists.

The grants to the federal government come to light as Prime Minister Stephen Harper’s Conservatives and the pro-oilsands website EthicalOil.org take Canadian environmental groups to task for accepting money from big American foundations to finance their campaigns against the oilsands.

Natural Resources Minister Joe Oliver accused “environmental and other radical groups” of trying to use money from “foreign special-interest groups” to hijack hearings on a pipeline that would bring Alberta oilsands bitumen to a port on the British Columbia coast.

But the Canadian government seems to have no qualms accepting grant money from private U.S. foundations — including some of the same organizations that gave to Canadian environmental groups.

For example, U.S. tax records show the California-based William and Flora Hewlett Foundation gave $750,000 to the David Suzuki Foundation and a whopping $40 million to the International Development Research Centre, a federal Crown corporation.

Letter to SaskPower President Regarding Solar Power

Here’s a letter going to the SaskPower President soon. If anyone has any suggestions for it, you have short time to make them.

Sundog

rwatson at ]saskpower.com[
Dear Mr. Watson,

I've found some troubling information on the SaskPower website. The first link is troubling because of what it leaves out. Solar energy, perhaps the best potential generation source of intermittent electricity, is not even considered? There's Photo Voltaic cells, solar power towers that operate with mirrors to generate heat, and net metered PV installations in operation today, and they aren't mentioned as a consideration for generation options? That's quite a gaping omission. I have a couple important requests listed at the bottom of this email, to address my concerns.

http://www.saskpower.com/future/?linkid=fridge_future_power_banner_april2011#/technology-options

This second link I found troubling because perhaps it explains why solar energy was omitted. The antiquated summary provided for PV (no mention of solar power towers), is from Y2K, a dozen years ago! Solar power technology has advanced since then, as I'm sure you must know.
http://www.saskpower.com/sustainable_growth/power_plan/generation_options/solar.shtml

"Solar converts the energy from the sun into electricity. At present, solar power is not suitable for large-scale generation in Saskatchewan because of its high cost and low capacity factors.
Solar research
In 2000, we installed a photovoltaic array at the Saskatchewan Science Centre for research purposes. Results showed that the cost savings realized from the solar energy system cannot effectively offset the capital costs for installation. As a result, this technology is better suited to niche applications where connection to the grid is uneconomical or when passive solar enhancement is desired. For the purposes of scientific demonstration, this project continues to be in operation."

A useful analogy of this summary is akin to saying in 2000 that full screen, smooth streaming video is not possible over the Internet. Now you can get that in your pocket on your smartphone, 12 years later. I request that you update your website with more recent facts regarding the two main forms of solar electricity (PV and heat-towers). If SaskPower does not have current research on these, I also request that you see that it happens soon, lest our province be left the laughing stock with our coal-fired electricity. And I'm interested to know if this gap in research and communication extends to the people in charge of moving SaskPower away from energy sources that are greatly harming our environment and survivability.

Sincerely,
[Saskboy]

cc. Honourable Rob Norris
Honourable Tim McMillian

Chantal Hebert – liveblog at UofRegina

image
Intro by Mitch D.
Then Rick Kleer
Last time she was here was 2004 when Martin won PM.

Journalists drank Regina out of white wine.

She broke a rib and got to cover an election from the ground, where most voters are anyway, giving her a better perspective.
Our new tools have built better silos. Sharing isn’t routine.
Background info from the govt is treated as FYEO (For Your Eyes Only).

140 char delivery is not delivering enough details to people. 30 seconds means 12 in radio. She’s had to edit some people down a bit so they sound effective, and to save her 8 seconds.

Rene Levesque was explaining a policy in detail once she recalls, and politicians don’t do that often anymore.

Layton didn’t produce a lot of memorable quotes prior to his deathbed letter filled with them.

Form response from government gives us “cones of silence”. A human can’t make themselves give detail-free form responses five or six times, but computers give us boring responses that people tune out.

She’s talking about media tech during Meech Lake. The TV was the best place to learn about a national debate. There was no great advantage to being in Manitoba or Newfoundland with only the politicians meeting there.

Ignatieff speaking at a rally in Quebec, talked about Harper barring attendees from his rallies. Some man told Hebert he wanted to hear about something the audience there cared about.
Twitter as a window into what people are interested in, is a distorted mirror.
“People on Twitter are junkies”.

People need to take to the streets still to finish the change started in cyberspace, like in Egypt for instance.

Not totally kidding, couldn’t use “prorogation” in news because it was too long.

Long form census scandal in July was surprising.

Nenshi in Calgary started at 1% in the polls. (Phone corrected Calgary to Calgarygrit – I must be a blogger.)

“Disconnected chattering class” is part of the problem.

Questions start. It’s unlikely that I will ask one this year.

Hebert likes a spin free environment. Know when they are going on holiday and ask them things when they have nothing going on. Know what they sound like when they are telling the truth. Each MP thinks what they are doing is in the public good.

Most politicians sound smarter when they are not in politics anymore. Party line is often a problem.

Twitter used to bounce stories off of it.

Election night publication law.
Elections Can may sue a lot of ordinary people. Voting isn’t like First Communion. BC might want to undo the damage done by voters in the East.

Municipal election lacks entertainment, except Toronto might object. She has a low interest in municipal politics these days.

Coverage of Ford is interesting in part because the cities are bigger than they once were, and many people vote for a mayor, as opposed for an MPP.

The nonConservative voters don’t have an easy way to win now that the Conservative party is united.

The Liberals and NDP are struggling for the same voters. Bruce Anderson argues the Liberals may come back as the spare wheel of Canadian politics. Minority govt is likely.
NDP and Liberals fight for the voters that Harper doesn’t want.

“We vote, and you don’t” is why govt talks about old age pensions instead of childcare.

Dan B. asks a question and starts out by mentioning that he isn’t a journalist. “Good” she said. (Too much competition in a field makes it harder to stay in a job anyway.)
Need healthy debate for healthy politics.
She votes as a citizen. Does a doctor like cancer more than cardiac arrest?
Vote as a parent to show your kids it is important.

ADDED:
Toward the end of the questions, someone wondered why OWS gets less coverage than he feels it deserves. She said OWS has unclear objectives, and doesn’t see the value in occupying public space. I found that odd, since earlier she praised youth in Egypt for taking their protest into the real world off of MySpace and Twitter. She thinks the ballot box is the way to make change happen, but also knows that her generation is more likely to continue to win, since it votes.

Another questioner was also disappointed by the answer they got regarding electoral reform. Hebert said voters and politicians don’t bring it up, so journalists shouldn’t. She neglected to mention that every political party uses methods other than FPTP to elect their party leader and/or executive. She did say that there is no voter appetite for PR or electoral reform. She thinks PR would work well federally though.

Make It Stop

“Unlike Big Oil, [greens] are not transparent about their motives.” – Financial Post complaining about American environmental groups who oppose leaky pipelines destined to spoil freshwater and the Pacific coast. And what are Big Oil’s unvarnished motives: A car in every driveway, and a top hat and monocle for every billionaire?

Meanwhile, the FP is running cover for the Harper Conservatives, because if anyone knows the power of lobbyists, it’s the party that Bruce Carson built. Read The Sixth Estate’s “Billionaire Conservatives Dominate Federal Lobbying”.

It’s hard not to break into a gigantic grin, the kind seen when watching Jon Stewart pants the witless, when you read this headline:
Rich U.S. groups that funded environmentalists also gave to Canadian government

Yes, the Canadian government that criticized “radical” “foreigners” as the source of Canada’s opposition to destructive fossil-first energy policy, took MILLIONS of dollars from the organizations they’ve badmouthed.
The CP headline pulled no cynical punches:
Still ‘radical’? Rich U.S. groups also gave to Ottawa

In an earlier email that was obtained by the NDP, Dodds said it was his understanding that Clement’s office advised Infrastructure Canada “which projects should be supported” under the G8 fund.

Angus and Boulerice have repeatedly accused Clement of having a direct hand in picking the successful projects, which included streetscaping, public washrooms, an upgraded community centre and improved parks in the Muskoka region north of Toronto where the meeting was held in the summer of 2010.

“This directly contradicts the testimony he gave at committee, it directly contradicts what he told the Canadian people,” Angus said at a news conference.

Clement has said that local mayors were the ones who whittled down a list of proposed projects and that he only facilitated the application process through his riding office by passing on the list of projects to Baird, who had the final say.

In September, Clement told reporters it would have been illegal for him to choose which projects were funded.

“If I was the decision-maker, if I had set up a parallel process and created a situation where the auditor general did not know — that’s their [opposition MPs'] accusation — I’d be resigning right now and turning myself in to the local police office,” Clement said.

“I think Tony Clement should be as good as his word,” Angus said Monday in recounting Clement’s comments. “He told the Canadian people, ‘If anybody could ever prove that I would do that, I’d turn myself over to the cops.’ Well, Tony, what about it?”

[emphasis mine]

Young Lamprey
- Another slimy parasite problem in Ontario lake country

Make it stop, please? Why do we deserve a government more corrupt than the Chretien Liberals, and perilously close to the Devine PCs? What will make people pay attention, without loss of life or calamity?

City Council January 3, 2012

A prayer for judicious action tonight opened the meeting at 5:30.
First there was a presentation by Costco to get a gas bar in their Vic East parking lot.
Mr. Rogers keeps saying ve-HICKle.
A couple questions from Councilors O’Donnell and Findura. After the presenters were seated, another councilor argued for the bar, and the motion passed. Then it was read a second and third time after a short pause for the public to speak if they wanted.

Accessibility committee speaking about snow removal, para transit and other problems.
2000 people a month are denied transit services! That doesn’t meet the City’s vision statement of inclusion.

Downtown plaza didn’t include input from accessibility challenged people until after it was built. A disabled person should be hired to test City systems and infrastructure.

Councilor Fondues asked if one of their six listed were most important. They said they need one through six implemented for the City to meet its vision.

Fully accessible fleet of buses by 2014. Is the capacity enough for everyone who needs the bus? I’d guess not close.

Peter Gilmer speaking on condo conversions. 3% vacancy in rental market is the sign of a healthy market, where people can find a place to rent. Regina is below 1% at .6%! Condo conversion contributes to homelessness in Regina.

At stake are 54 rental units.
Councillor Browne thinks 79% of the 54 would still be rented if converted. Gilmer is skeptical. Browne thinks a permanent freeze will discourage development of new rental housing.

Councilor Fougere says Gilmer has an “interesting” perspective. He then asks if Trickle Down Housing will happen if condo owners move out of lower cost housing.

Antipoverty Network speaker expressed dismay that Councilors have not connected homelessness with the removal of affordable housing. Listing conversion rules in Ottawa, Hamilton and elsewhere.
Social impact assessments are not being done, bit they should be.

Fougere asks if the delegation has presented to the provincial government, presumably to indicate he doesn’t think this is a problem the city can solve.

Jim Elliot speaking against the Hamilton St. Demolition.

Diane Delaney of PADS speaks next. SK has third highest child poverty rate in Canada. Women are staying with abusive partners rather than live homeless. Homes are a place to relax, and for the people there to express who they are. Homeless people cannot have a shower, or living in a van with kids. Lawmakers appear to not empathize with thaws people.

Converted properties if rented always cost more.

I had to leave early, right after Shawn Fraser of Carmichael Outreach had his say. Again, a Councilor, this time O’Donnel, main question was if the delegate had spoken with, or planned to speak to, the provincial government. It’s my belief that councilors do not believe that they can affect the homelessness problem in Regina through their bylaws. They certainly can, and do, however.

Arguing Against Sustainability

On the weekend I had an argument with @unambig (Adrian), a former blogger turned journalist in BC, and @BSnowsell (Brandon) a Saskatoonian Conservative. They’ve said they are against government involvement in making infrastructure for sustainable transportation. Adrian is upset by the carbon tax, and Brandon wants no money put into giving electric powered vehicles a chance to replace gas vehicles.

His accounting of the situation is far from accurate. Trillions of dollars have gone into gasoline vehicle infrastructure throughout the 20th century. Watch Taken For A Ride, the story of how GM bought and undermined electric streetcar systems across America, and was convicted for its calculated and malicious actions to force people into cars on the Interstate instead. Brandon and Adrian who argue against putting a few Billion dollars into electric/hybrid cars to put them on par with gas vehicles, are making them start from a lopsided position.

Brandon: that’s a ludicrous argument. Infrastructure benefits both and therefore not for/against either vehicle. #commonsense

ADDED: [Brandon clarifies his position, and helps back up what I've said:] I am against public $$$ being used for electric recharge stations. Gas stations are private. Supply/Demand. #basicconcept

Existing infrastructure favours who it was built for. Tried gas in a totally electric car lately? Sheesh! Closest battery swap station is where? You say existing infrastructure favours both, which is plainly FALSE. The infrastructure, from freeways, to service station types and locations, favours gas vehicles. Complaining that an electric vehicle doesn’t travel as far is an artificial roadblock, because gas vehicles didn’t travel as far when they were first unleashed too. How many gas service stations along rural routes have dried up in the last decades as gas mileage got better?

ADDED: [There was no demand for freeways until GM manufactured the need by decimating public transportation. If the government doesn't promote and pay for infrastructure changes, individuals will not change behaviour. We don't have time to wait for supply/demand to drive change, because there will be little demand if the technology isn't made mainstream through government advertising and implementation. The "demand" by the way doesn't have to be for electric vehicles specifically, it is also represented by those demanding the Gov't do something now to stop climate change.]

The convenience of gas burning vehicles is completely outweighed by the dangers from climate change, smog, and resource depletion. Nothing else matters to people, if they are dead, or have no clean water, air, or food. Climate change is affecting our ability to have all of those three things now, and it is going to get much worse for most people on the planet, soon. Electric cars would give us another decade or more to work on better solutions.

We’ve switched personal transportation methods plenty of times in the last 100 years, we can’t stop now and settle on gas burning cars that get only 30 MPG. It’s really a matter of life or death. That’s why I’m passionate about this sort of progress. Eliminating inefficiency in how we travel is crucial, and can’t be delayed by people who don’t even understand science let alone the social and environmental havoc their transportation choices wreak.

== Continue reading

Get Mad At SaskPower

I don’t know why I’m mad today at SaskPower. It’s not like they’ve gone out of their way to piss me off lately. I simply started thinking about how unjust it is that there are unscientific smear campaigns against wind power, but there aren’t as many well funded groups of citizens spreading FUD about coal plants (Maybe because there are heaps of evidence of death and destruction to throw, Fear Uncertainty and Doubt get left unused.)

By the way, have you heard that living near a coal plant makes you unattractive to the opposite sex?

Anyway, back on track…

Take a look at the “research” done by SaskPower, into solar electricity generation. Their webpage cites a study from 2000. In solar electricity terms, that may as well be a 1998 study talking about the Internet! A year ago I spoke with a senior person at SaskPower who told me they expected solar power installations to be on the market which would break even with coal generation costs, within just 10 years instead of 17 years. Why do they not have that sort of research on their website promoting solar PV installs that could be net metered?

It’s a bloody disgrace, and another reason why Saskatchewan lags behind most of Canada in renewable energy and green jobs.

Fortunately there are people who care, who are dragging SaskPower along with us into the 21st century. It should not take thousands of years to convert the province to renewable energy, but at the current pace that SaskPower is working at, it could not happen earlier! We need more electrical and construction professionals.

Solar PV

Speaking of those sorts of people, if you’re looking for renewable energy professionals, Sound Solar Systems I like to recommend because I know James (and I get a little cut of big installs if my reference is mentioned ;-). There are amazing solar and wind technologies available for purchase today that will get you off off the coal burning treadmill that SaskPower has us hooked on.